Application of costal cartilage in oriental secondary rhinoplasty / 中华医学美学美容杂志

Objective To introduce the experience of using costal cartilage in oriental secondary rhinoplasty.Methods From January 2012 to December 2016,we used costal cartilage grafts to obtain a functional and aesthetic reconstruction,in which silicone was used in 34 previous cases and e-PTFE was used in 5 cases.Results The mean duration of follow-up was 1.5 years,43 (86％) patients showed high satisfaction with the shape of nose.1 case of infection and 2 cases of costal cartilage warping occurred.1 case was somewhat dissatisfactied with outcome.There was no case of chest wall deformity and pneumothorax,but scar on the chest wall at the donor site was observed in 2 cases.Conclusions We have obtained good aesthetic results using costal cartilage grafts which could display sufficient and stable support for the scaffold of nose.We can conclude that costal cartilage is a good material in secondary rhinoplasty,and can be used to reconstruct an aesthetic nose.

Clinical efficacy of novel ‘umbrella’ autogenous graft in secondary cleft rhinoplasty / 中华医学美学美容杂志

Objective To observe the effects of a novel type ‘umbrella’ graft in secondary cleft rhinoplasty.Methods 38 secondary cleft patients with moderate to severe nasal deformity that were older than 16 years in our department from September 2013 to March 2016 were received rhinoplasty with novel type ‘umbrella’ graft.Nasal augmentation and piriformaperture filling with autologous rib cartilage was applied in patients with saddle nose or nasal base depression.The appearance and patient's satisfaction were assessed at 6 months after surgery.Results There were no complications such as infection,hematoma and graft exposure in all 38 patients with rhinoplasty.The nasal tip,dorsum,nostril and nasal base were improved significantly 6 months after surgery.Especially the nasal tip and nostril,most of them,became almost normal.The patients' self-evaluation of the appearance and function were satisfying.Conclusions The novel type ‘umbrella’ graft can improve the deformity of cleft nose significantly,especially the appearance of the nose tip and nostril,which is a reliable method.

Causas de rinoplastía secundaria: análisis de 277 casos / Secondary rhinoplasty causes: analysis of 277 cases

Introducción: La rinoplastía secundaria cada día es más frecuente debido a la creciente popularidad de la cirugía estética y también por las mayores expectativas del paciente y del cirujano. La rinoplastía secundaria ha llegado a ser un campo en evolución con desafíos únicos. Para enfrentarlo adecuadamente el cirujano debe analizar y comprender las necesidades específicas del paciente y las causas anatómicas que generaron el problema y cómo corregirlo. Objetivo: Identificar los problemas anatómicos más frecuentemente encontrados en 277 rinoplastías secundarias y sistematizarlos para una mejor evaluación preoperatoria y planificación quirúrgica. Material y método: Análisis retrospectivo de 1.160 rinoplastías operadas por el otorrinolaringólogo Dr. Luis Villarroel entre el 1 de enero de 2006 y el 31 de marzo de 2015, de las cuales 277 son rinoplastías secundarias (24%). En ellas se encontraron 1.197 problemas o deformidades (4,3 promedio), que se dividieron en tercio superior, medio, inferior y endonasales, con una subdivisión de deformidades individuales dentro de cada grupo. También se comparan los resultados encontrados según si la cirugía primaria fue de otro cirujano (rinoplastías secundarias) o del mismo autor (rinoplastías de revisión). Resultados: El 85% de los pacientes presentó problemas en el tercio inferior. Los problemas más frecuentes fueron desviación del tabique nasal (problema endonasal) (56%), punta hiporotada (47%), desviación del dorso óseo (34%) y desviación del dorso cartilaginoso (30%). Las rinoplastías de revisión, comparadas con las secundarias, presentan un porcentaje mayor de problemas de insuficiente resección del dorso óseo y menos dorsos cartilaginosos estrechos. Conclusión: Existen diferentes razones por las que un paciente busca una rinoplastía secundaria. Es importante conocer las causas más frecuentes con el fin de identificar los errores cometidos en el primer caso y evitar dichas prácticas. Es preferible una cirugía primaria conservadora porque evita problemas difíciles de resolver. Esta clasificación nos ayuda a sistematizar el análisis preoperatorio, a saber, dónde estamos teniendo problemas y así corregirlos y obtener mejores resultados quirúrgicos.

Introduction: Secondary rhinoplasty is becoming increasingly common due to the growing popularity of cosmetic surgery and also by higher expectations of the patient and the surgeon. Secondary rhinoplasty has become an evolving field with unique challenges. To repair the surgeon must properly analyze and understand the specific concerns of the patient and the anatomical causes of why you need a new operation. Aim: To identify anatomical problems most frequently found in 277 secondary and systematize rhinoplasty for better preoperative evaluation and surgical planning. Material and method: Retrospective analysis of 1160 rhinoplasty operated by otolaryngologist Dr. Luis Villarroel between January 1006 and March 31, 2015, of which 277 are secondary rhinoplasty (24%). In this study we found 1197 problems or deformities (average 4.3), They were classified into upper, middle, bottom third ,and endonasal, with an individual deformities subdivision within each group. The results are compared if the primary surgery was another surgeon (secondary rhinoplasty of others) or by the same author (revision rhinoplasty). Results: 85% of patients had problems in the lower third. The most common individual problems identificated were deviated septum (56%), drop tip (47%), bone dorsum deviation (34%), and cartilaginous dorsum desviation (30%). The author presents a higher percentage of insufficient bone resection and less cartilaginous dorsum narrow. Conclusion: There are different reasons why a patient seeks a secondary rhinoplasty. It is important to know the most frequent causes in order to identify the mistakes made in the first instance and avoid them. It's preferable one conservative primary surgery because it avoids difficult problems. This classification helps us to systematize the preoperative analysis and better results.

Injerto costal en rinoplastia. Recaudos anatómicos para la recolección de cartílago costal / Costal graft in rhinoplasty. Anatomical collections for thecollection of costal cartilage / Enxerto costal na rinoplastia. Coleções anatômicas para a cartilagem colheitacostela

Introducción: la finalidad es ponderar el conocimiento anatómico indispensable de la pared torácica para la recolección segura de cartílago costal en rinoplastia. Materiales y métodos: Se dividió en dos fases. Esta presentación corresponde a la Fase I, de tipo descriptiva observacional. La Fase II (actualmente en curso) tiene un diseño prospectivo y experimental para una futura presentación. Primera instancia: recolección de información bibliográfica, de no más de 5 años de antigüedad en bases de datos médicos y textos específicos. Segunda instancia: representación del acto quirúrgico en 3 especímenes cadavéricos humanos. En cada espécimen se realizaron 4 abordajes (2 submamarios y 2 subcostales inferiores) se hizo hincapié en la descripción de aquellas estructuras anatómicas importantes para respetar en el abordaje de la pared torácica. Resultados: Fue posible recrear las diferentes técnicas de abordaje de la pared costal. Se pudo constatar que la ubicación del paquete vasculonervioso dentro del surco costal fue constante inter especímenes e intra espécimen. La relación entre el pericondrio interno, la fascia endotorácica y la hoja parietal de la pleura resultó ser un sistema fibroadhesivo complejo y variable. Coincidimos con la bibliografía acerca de que la técnica se dificulta cuando se realiza la recolección a nivel costal más proximal. Conclusiones: Creemos que el conocimiento de la anatomía torácica es indispensable para realizar una correcta técnica de disección y posterior recolección de cartílago costal; esto disminuiría las complicaciones y la morbilidad en el sitio dador. El neumotórax y el dolor neuropático provienen del daño de estructuras anatómicas constantes.

Introduction: the purpose is to weight the anatomical knowl edge essential to the chestwall for the safe collection of costal cartilage in rhinoplasty. Materials and methods: It is divided in to two phases. This presentation corresponds to Phase I, of an observational descriptive type. Phase II (currently underway) has a prospective and experimental design for future presentation. First instance: collection of bibliographic information, not more than 5 years old in medical databases and specific texts. Second instance: representation of the surgical act in 3 human cadaveric specimens. In each specimen, 4 approaches (2 sub mamarios and 2 lower subcostals) were performed, emphasizing the description of those anatomical structures important to respect in the thoracic wall approach. Results: It was possible to recreate the different techniques of approaching the costal wall. It was observed that the location of the vasculo nervioso package with in the costal groove was constant between specimens and intra specimen. The relationship between the internal perichondrium, the endothoracic fascia and the parietal leaf of the pleura turned out to be a complex and variable fibro adhesive system. We agree with the bibliography that the technique is difficult twhen the collection is carried out at the most proximal costal level. Conclusions: We believe that knowl edge of the thoracic anatomy is essential to perform a correct technique of dissection and later collection of costal cartilage, this would reduce complications and morbidity in the donor site. Pneumothorax and neuropathic painarise from the damage of constant anatomical structures.

Introdução: o objetivo é avaliar o conhecimento anatômico essencial da parede torácica para a recolha de cartilagem costal em rinoplastia. Materiais e métodos: dividido em duas fases. Esta apresentação corresponde à Fase I, observacional descritivo. Fase II (em curso) tem um desenho prospectivo e experimental para uma apresentação futuro. Primeira instância: recolha de informação bibliográfica, não mais de 5 anos de idade em bancos de dados médicos e textos específicos. Segunda instância: a representação da cirurgia em 3 espécimes de cadá- veres humanos. Em cada espécime 4 abordagens (2 submamária e 2 inferior subcostal) enfatizou a descrição dessas estruturas anatômicas importantes a respeitar no tratamento da parede torácica foram realizadas. Resultados: Foi possível recriar as diferentes técnicas de abordagem parede torácica. Verificou-se que a localização do feixe neurovascular no sulco costal foi constante espécimes inter e intra espécime. A relação entre o pericôndrio interno, a fáscia e a folha intratorácica pleura parietal provou ser um sistema de fibro adhesive complexa e variável. Estamos de acordó com a literatura que a técnica é difícil quando a coleção é composta nível costal mais proximal. Conclusão: Acreditamos que o conhecimento da anatomia torácica é essencial para uma correta técnica de dissecção e subsequenterecolha de cartilagem costal, este iria diminuir as complicações e morbidade no sítiodoador. Pneumotórax e dorneuropática vem de danos causados por estrutura sanatômicas constantes.

Dorsal Augmentation in Secondary Rhinoplasty

Two most common pathologic mechanisms which cause secondary rhinoplasty are related with nasal framework and it's envelope. The reasonable definition defining key features of the secondary rhinoplasty 'Scarred nasal soft tissue envelope overlying adherent and distorted nasal framework' gives full explanation about main deformities in the secondary rhinoplasty, and leads us to focus on reconstructing and reinforcing both structures when the secondary rhinoplasty is performed. Moreover, artificial alloplastic implants and injectable materials, popularly used for augmentation rhinoplasty, erode skin and give damages to skin and appendages. It is, therefore, essential to understand the importance of skin problem and to know that one must be ready to suffer from another more difficult operations and its unpredictable results, unless it is properly reinforced. I have used several autogenous materials (n=294) and two kinds of xenografts (n=35) in the secondary rhinoplasties during the last 8 years for reinforcing the envelopes in pathologic conditions and augmenting the dorsal volume. I have learned a lesson from these 8 years of experience about dorsal augmentation in secondary rhinoplasty. 1) Even though it seems to be time consuming and annoying to harvest and prepare autogenous graft materials, no xenografts or artificial materials are safer and more consistent than autogenous materials, and no convenience is more valuable than consistency and safety in secondary rhinoplasty. 2) If you need to augment nasal dorsum in secondary rhinoplasty, get the permission from the nasal envelope. 3) Remind this aphorism: Alloplastics are only convenient on the day of surgery.

Secondary Rhinoplasty Using Scarpa's Fascia

PURPOSE: The performance of rhinoplasty on the patient who has already undergone unsatisfactory results or complications after augmentation rhinoplasty is a challenging surgical problem. Because the dead space is remained after removal of the foreign body and the thickness of the skin is not even, the deformity would be more conspicuous if the nose is reconstructed again with hard implant only or autogenous cartilage. In these cases, the autogenous fascia can be used to get a good result. We present our clinical experience of secondary rhinoplasty using Scarpa's fascia of lower abdomen. METHODS: Thirty-two patients underwent the procedure from March of 2002 to February of 2007. Nine patients were reconstructed with Scarpa's fascia only, eighteen patients were reconstructed with silicone implant and fascia, and five patients were reconstructed with cartilage and fascia for secondary rhinoplasty. RESULTS: There were no major complications. Most of the patients were satisfied with the results. The deviation of the silicone implant and postoperative hypertrophic scar of the donor site were seen in one case each. Postoperative absorption of fascia were seen in two cases using Scarpa's fascia only. CONCLUSION: Secondary rhinoplasty using Scarpa's fascia is very useful method which offers a minimized donor site scar, low complication rate, shorter operation time and patient satisfaction and prevents the alopecia caused by the harvest of temporalis fascia.

Secondary Augmentation Rhinoplasty with Immediate Autogenous Dermofat Graft after Removal of Paraffinoma

PURPOSE: Paraffin has been used to augment depressed nasal contour for many years by illegally. Reported complications of nasal paraffinoma were skin thinning, displacement of nasal profile, redness, chronic inflammation and malignant change to skin cancer. The current authors report results of the secondary rhinoplasty after excision of nasal paraffinoma. METHODS: Through the open rhinoplasty incision, paraffinoma was removed under direct vision. Saline irrigation and meticulous hemostasis were performed. Simultaneously, the secondary depressed nasal deformity was corrected with autogenous dermofat graft harvested from inferior gluteal fold. The dermofat was fixed to the nasofrontal area with bolster suture, and the interdormal area of the tip. RESULTS: A total of 13 patients underwent secondary augmentation with autogenous dermofat graft after removal of paraffinoma from 2000 to 2004. The mean follow-up period was 15 months. There were no postoperative complications. All patients were satisfied with their surgical results. However, there were 10 to 20 percent resorption of the grafted dermofat. CONCLUSION: It is suggest that autogenous dermofat be one of good materials for the correction of the secondary deformity after removal of nasal paraffinoma. In addition, autogenous dermofat graft presented easy harvesting and manipulation for transfer, high survival rate by firm fixation to the recipient site and stable surgical results.

The Importance of Sheen's Ground Rules in Secondary Rhinoplasty

Sheen's ground rules can help avoid many of the pitfalls in secondary rhinoplasty. There are 1) establish realistic patient expectations; 2) defer surgery until the final resolution of the tissues; 3) have a well-defined aesthetic concept; 4) make a proper diagnosis; 5) limit the dissection and 6) use only the autogenous materials. The authors tried to ascertain which rule is the most important and should be strictly obeyed, what is the effect if the rules not obeyed, and what is the important aspects of any other rules not mentioned. Eight females cases(n=8) of secondary rhinoplasty from 1992 to 2002 were analyzed according to Sheen's ground rules. After surgery, the implants or the grafted tissues were either exposed or extruded, in two out of the five cases that did not follow the second principle, in two out of the four cases that did not the sixth principle, and in one case that did not the fifth principle. The authors conclude that all the principles of the ground rules should be obeyed if possible, most of all, it is very important to obey the first principle i.e. establishing the a realistic expectation, and second principle i.e. deferring the surgery until more than a year. Though it is undoubtful that the use of the autogenous materials is the best choice, the authors believe that a limited incisions and dissections and the use of smaller implants can help reduce the risk of complication if the alloplastic implants should be used.